Management and practices of corporate social responsibility in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic
Abstract
The COVID-19 scenario led to new ways of buying, selling, and consuming, a triad that lead to emerging voluntary bets on the part of companies for social, economic, and environmental improvement that legitimizes their actions in thnew context. This mentioned process in situations such as confinement, work at home, interaction with diverse teams, and even the transformation of productive practices in the face of the scarcity of raw materials led to a behavioral perspective of corporate social responsibility (CSR) focused on the adaptative capacity of the dynamics of the context. Under this understanding, this research characterizes the management and practices of CSR during the pandemic in Latin America. Methodologically, the 200 best-positioned companies in the Merco Ranking were studied, allowing interaction of companies, leaders, and corporate responsibility and governance. The «social contribution» variable was analyzed with eight crossed variables and contrasted with the information disclosed by the organizations have studied regarding management and CSR practices in the period of the pandemic. The selected countries were Uruguay and Colombia, considering their extreme geographic location on the continent, the disparity in GDP, and the difference in state policies to manage the pandemic. After inferring the research hypothesis, it was possible to determine that the companies studied, despite the territorial disparity, geographical aspects, the number of inhabitants, and separate management of the pandemic, both in Colombia and Uruguay, adopted several measures to face the crisis produced by the COVID-19. Additionally, a social contribution has in both markets has been made, where 92% of Uruguayan companies and 99% of Colombia companies have developed new business models. The mentioned models include digitization of operations, delivery of food baskets and personal hygiene, technological contributions, and among others, donations of supplies and medical pieces of equipment. The companies that contributed the most are located at the top of the ranking in their countries and mostly belong to the industrial sector, a sector that in principle is most affected by the pandemic. In addition, the longest-standing companies made greater contributions. All of those studied presented sustainability reports using international standards and indicators and focused on social and environmental contributions since the beginning of the pandemic.
References
Agle, B. R., Donaldson, T., Freeman, R. E., Jensen, M. C., Mitchell, R. K., & Wood, D. J. (2008). Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 153-190.
Archel, P., Husillos, J., Larrinaga, C., & Spence, C. (2009). Social disclosure, legitimacy theory and the role of the state. Accounting, auditing & accountability journal , 22(November):1284-1307.
BBC. (2020). Coronavirus en Uruguay: la singular y exitosa estrategia del país para contener la pandemia sin cuarentena obligatoria. Obtenido el 7 de julio del 2020 de: https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-america-latina-52837193
Boatright, J. R. (1996). Business ethics and the theory of the firm. Am. Bus. LJ, 34, 217.
Butler, H. N. (1988). The contractual theory of the corporation.Geo. Mason UL Rev., 11, 99.
CEPAL, N. (2018). Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible: una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe.
Crespo, C., Curvelo-Hassán, J. O., & Ripol, V. (2016). Nuevas perspectivas de la gobernanza privada: un análisis desde las prácticas de responsabilidad social y ambiental de las empresas en Colombia.Revista Republicana, (21).
Fischer, J. (2004). Social responsibility and ethics: clarifying the concepts. Journal of Business ethics, 52(4), 381-390.
France 24. (2020). Colombia y el Covid-19, radiografía de un país que enfrenta la peor cara de la pandemia. Obtenido el 13 de agosto del 2020 de: https://www.france24.com/es/20200728-colombia-pandemia-covid19-crisis-sanitaria-hospitales
He, H., & Harris, L. (2020). The Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing Philosophy. Journal of Business Research, 116, 176-182.
Johns Hopkins University & Medicine. (2020). See the latest data in your region. Obtenido el 14 de diciembre del 2020 de: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/region
Jonas, H. (2014). Technology and responsibility: reflections on the new tasks of ethics. In Ethics and emerging technologies(pp. 37-47). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Kirk, C. P., & Rifkin, L. S. (2020). I’ll Trade You Diamonds for Toilet Paper: Consumer Reacting, Coping and Adapting Behaviors in the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of Business Research, 117, 124-131.
Maritz, A. (2020). A multi-disciplinary business approach to COVID-19: la trobe business school perspectives. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 13(1).
Popkova, E., DeLo, P., & Sergi, B. S. (2021). Corporate social responsibility amid social distancing during the COVID-19 crisis: BRICS vs. OECD countries. Research in International Business and Finance, 55, 101315.
PwC Uruguay. (2020). Novedades laborales COVID-19. Obtenido el 20 de julio del 2020 de: https://www.pwc.com.uy/es/covid-19/pdfs-covid-19/via-rapida-no-vedades-laborales-covid19-abril.pdf
Qiu, S. C., Jiang, J., Liu, X., Chen, M. H., & Yuan, X. (2021). Can corporate social responsibility protect firm value during the COVID-19 pandemic? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 93, 102759.
Rendtorff, J. D. (2009). Responsibility, ethics and legitimacy of corporations. Society and Business Review.
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. Accounting review, 53(1), 112-134.
Wittgenstein, L. (2014). Lecture on ethics . Edoardo Zamuner (Editor), Ermelinda Valentina Di Lascio (Editor), D. K. Levy (Editor). Editorial,? Wiley-Blackwell. Primera edición.
